Legal Opinion
Chambliss v. Haeberle
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 16, 1940No. Civ. No. 810PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, District Judge.
The plaintiff admits the general rule that suitors as well as witnesses coming from another state or jurisdiction are exempt from the service of civil process while in attendance upon court and during a reasonable time in coming and going,1 but says: When the defendant moves to strike the service herein on the ground that he was served while he was a witness coming from another state or jurisdiction to give testimony in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, such motion cannot prevail, because the defendant on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Church v. ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- Kaufman v. GarnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1909
- Sofge v. LoweTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Feister v. HulickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Centennial Insurance v. HandalDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995