Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stipec v. Owen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1954No. 29030PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Commissioner.

This is an original proceeding, in prohibition wherein relator, John Stipec, Jr., defendant in the divorce case of Blanche Stipec v. John Stipec, Jr. now pending in Division No. 16 of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis before respondent, Hon. Oswald P. Owen, Judge of said court, seeks to have respondent prohibited from further proceeding in said cause. Upon the filing of respondent’s rétjirn relator filed a motion -for judgment on the pleadings. Consequently we take as true the undenied facts well pleaded in the petition and return, State ex rel. Drainage Dist. No.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re MoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 8 v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Kaufman v. GarnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1909
  4. Moyer v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Reid v. HamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. HitchcockDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1958
  2. Beard v. BeardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API