Legal Opinion

Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. . Scrugham

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1910PublishedCited by 93 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Divison of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 13, 1909, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion to set aside the service of a summons and complaint and denied said motion. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Divison of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 13, 1909, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion to set aside the service of a summons and complaint and denied said motion. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The rule exempting one coming from a foreign state for attendance upon a judicial proceeding in this state from the service of process eundo, morando, et redeundo, is applicable alike to criminal and civil actions. (Mullen v. Sanborn, 25 L. R. A. 721; Parker v.…

1Opinion of the CourtWerner, J.

The defendant, a resident of the state of Ohio, came into this state voluntarily in April, 1907. While here he attended a legislative hearing in the city of Albany. At that time he was arrested on a warrant, issued by a magistrate in the city of 27ew York, charging him with the crime of conspiracy. He was taken to the city of 27ew York, where he gave bail for his appearance pending the examination. The examination resulted in his being held, and he subsequently gave bail to appear and answer the charge in whatever court it might be prosecuted. In June, 1907, an indict ment was found against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Person v. . GrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Parker v. . MarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Adriance v. . LagraveNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Wangler v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Ryan v. EbeckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Crusco v. Strunk Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. New England Industries, Inc. v. MargiottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API