Rolan v. Rittenhouse

Jordan, Judge.

This was a suit to recover the sum of $726.50 allegedly due the plaintiff under an oral agreement entered into by the plaintiff and the defendant for the purpose of dissolving a partnership between the parties. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant and the exception is to the denial of the plaintiff’s amended motion for new trial. Held:

1. The first special ground of the amended motion for new trial which assigns error on the admission of certain testimony elicited from the plaintiff on cross-examination does not require consideration since the record in this case…