Legal Opinion

Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Zeigler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1969No. 44626PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.(a) Counsel for plaintiff in his opening statement referred to defendant’s train as “barrelling through Stockton.” A motion for mistrial was made on the ground that this remark was prejudicial. The court overruled the motion, did not rebuke counsel, and did not instruct the jury to disregard the comment. In an opening statement counsel may state to the jury what he expects to prove. He should be confined to matters of proof admissible under the rules of evidence. Green v. State, 172 Ga. 635 (158 SE 285); Waits v. Hardy, 214 Ga. 41 (102 SE2d 590, 68 ALR2d 995). The law…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Willis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Butts v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Lewyn v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. MitchamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Fielding v. DriggersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API