Milam v. Mandeville Mills
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Under the facts narrated above, the verdict in favor of the defendant was authorized, and it can not be set aside on the general grounds.
The first ground of special exception complains, with reference to the charge of the court, that admissions in the pleadings “may be taken as proof,” whereas, as the plaintiff contends, the rule is that a party is absolutely bound by unstricken admissions of fact thus made, and consequently it was not a question for the jury to 'determine, by any méthod or by any sort of proof, whether or not the defendant company had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bishop v. Georgia National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Columbus Railroad v. KitchensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Denson v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Central Georgia Electric Membership Corp. v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Rolan v. RittenhouseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Aiken v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Guaranty Life Insurance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.