Legal Opinion

Kristoffy v. Iwanski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 93, Calendar No. 35,585PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

From an order dismissing garnishment plaintiff has appealed. The declaration is in substance that plaintiff, because of fraud and conspiracy of defendants, was induced to part with real property of the value of $5,000, and money, $385, in the total sum of $5,385, in exchange for a vendor’s interest in a land contract covering mortgaged property, and that such interest was wholly worthless and fraudulent. The declaration is in affirmance of the transaction, and in assumpsit upon waiver of the tort. The affidavit for writ of garnishment is that the indebtedness on “such contract” is the sum of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Old Ben Coal Co. v. Universal Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Roelofson v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Plefka v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Burchy v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Billig v. GoodrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rutter v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Talbert v. Solventol Chemical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. SchomakerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Genesee County Drain Commissioner v. Genesee CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Talbert v. Solventol Chemical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API