Plefka v. Detroit United Railway
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by John Plefka against the Detroit United Railway for money had and received. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff brought this action in justice’s court in assumpsit, and declared on the common counts. On the trial he offered evidence to show that his wife, Celia Plefka, sustained an injury while riding upon a car of defendant through defendant’s negligence, and that this negligent act of defendant had made it necessary for plaintiff to expend $43 for medical attendance. Defendant contended that there could be no recovery under the pleadings. The contention was overruled, and judgment was entered for the plaintiff. Thereupon defendant sued out a writ of certiorari to the circuit court,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tuttle v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Watson v. SteverMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Williams v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Bullock v. UeberrothMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nelson & Witt v. Texas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Janiszewski v. BehrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Kristoffy v. IwanskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Albee v. SchmiedMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Rolland Township v. PakesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.