Legal Opinion

Busselman v. Egge

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2015No. 27175PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Todd and Joanne Egge placed obstructions on a platted but unimproved service road. Gary Busselman sued Egg-es, contending that the service road was open to public travel because it had been dedicated and accepted by the City of Sioux Falls and Minnehaha County. The circuit court agreed, and it granted sum*787mary judgment in favor of Busselman. On appeal, Egges do not argue the -merits of the dedication/acceptance question. The sole issue is whether the circuit court erred in failing to require joinder of an indispensable party; i.e. the appropriate governmental entity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tinaglia v. IttzesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Thieman v. BohmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Smith v. AlbrechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. J.K. Dean, Inc. v. KSD, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doermer v. Oxford Fin. Grp., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Chicoine v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Oyen v. Lawrence Cty. Comm'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API