Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Lee v. Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

In tbe appeal reported in 189 N. C., p. 247, Stacy, J., said:. “Our original opinion (186 N. C., 127) will be modified to tbe extent above indicated; the cause will be remanded, to the end that it may be heard and determined according to the usual course and practice o£ the Court, not inconsistent with the principles announced in this opinion. Under a proper interpretation of the above excerpts from our last opinion, we think his Honor was in error in holding that the recent opinion rendered by the Supreme Court in this action is a bar to plaintiff, realtor’s rights to show the dates of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brewer v. RingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Currie v. MalloySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Lee v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Geer v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hartley v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Brewer v. . Ring and ValkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Vinson v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. McDaniel v. Bass-Smith Funeral Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API