State Ex Rel. Lee v. Martin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
OlaeK, 0. J.
Each and every one of the nine exceptions to the judgment should be sustained. Exception 1. 0. S., 354 provides that the official bond of the clerk of the Superior Court shall not “become void upon the first recovery, or if judgment is given for the defendant, but may be put in suit and prosecuted from time to time until the whole penalty is recovered; and every such officer and the sureties on his official bond shall be liable to the person injured for the acts done by said officer by virtue and under color of his office.”
The defendant bonding company filed in this proceeding its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The United States, in Error v. Phineas Bradley, Surviving Administrator of David Ott DeceasedSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- McMullen v. Winfield Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- State, by the At. Gen'l, Hargrove, Lee v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Eichorn v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Clisby v. MastinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kugle v. Glen Rose Independent School Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Lee v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Town of Scotland Neck v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Birchfield v. Department of Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Lee v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.