Legal Opinion
Petrunich v. Sun Building Systems, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 7, 2008No. 3:CV-04-2234PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
THOMAS I. VANASKIE, District Judge.
At issue in this matter is the amount of attorney fees and costs to be awarded to Plaintiff Ronald Petrunich as the prevailing party in his lawsuit brought under federal and state antidiscrimination statutes. Mr. Petrunich sued Defendants Sun Building Systems, Inc., d/b/a Contempri Homes (“Sun”), Thomas Schott, and Jim Jones (collectively “Defendants”), alleging, inter alia, that Defendants terminated his employment because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621-634, and the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cabrera v. JakabovitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Watcher v. Pottsville Area Emergency Medical Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Murakowski v. University of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Styers v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Tobin v. GordonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.