Legal Opinion

Styers v. Pennsylvania

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 2008No. Civil 1:CV-05-2127PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WILLIAM W. CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction

We are considering the amended motion for award of attorney’s fees and costs filed by counsel for Plaintiff Gregory Styers. Counsel successfully litigated Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim and seeks a total of $117,914.18 in attorney’s fees and costs from Defendant David Guido. Upon consideration of the motion, we will award fees and costs, but we will reduce the amount sought by Plaintiffs counsel.

II. Background

Styers, a Pennsylvania State Police (“PSP”) trooper, filed this § 1983 action against the Commonwealth of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. LETT v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API