Legal Opinion
United States v. Payden
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 4, 1985No. SS 84 Cr. 566 (DNE)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Defendants Donald Payden (“Payden”), Anthony Grant (“Grant”) and Eugene Coleman (“Coleman”) are charged with conspiring to violate the narcotics laws of the United States in violation of Title 21, Section 846 of the United States Code. Defendant Payden is also charged with heading a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848 and with distributing, and possessing with intent to distribute, narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. The facts of this case are more fully set forth in other opinions. 1
Defendants Grant and Coleman have…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael YamanisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Mark A. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Gonzalo GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Manuel Vasquez and Jose Pollo RenteriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- State v. BeitelNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. BarnettCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
- United States v. BalagulaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- United States v. PaydenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.