Legal Opinion
United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael Yamanis
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 7, 1984No. 82-5840PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Constantine Yamanis, Michael Yamanis, Vincent Calise and George Thomas Darby were convicted and sentenced for their involvement in a large drug smuggling operation. The issues presented on appeal are:(1) whether Constantine Yamanis’ right to a speedy trial under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1) was violated;(2) whether the trial court’s denying Constantine Yamanis’ motions for continuance constituted error under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(2) or an abuse of discretion;(3) whether Constantine Yamanis was denied a fair and impartial trial as a result of the trial court’s jury…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. ChippasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.