Legal Opinion
United States v. Payden
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 26, 1985No. SS 84 Cr. 566 (DNE)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion is the sixth relating to this case. The background facts may be read in the other opinions. 1 Familiarity with them is assumed.
At a robing room conference during the trial of this case, defendant Anthony Grant’s attorney, Robert Herbst, stated that the government was about to introduce evidence against his client that constituted inadmissible hearsay and moved to exclude the evidence. (Tr. at 1641-42). 2 The court requested the government to present an offer of proof regarding this testimony. (Tr. 1704). Assistant United States Attorney…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Dennis Geaney and Vincent Russell LynchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McDavid v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. PaydenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985