Legal Opinion
United States v. Balagula
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1986No. 85 CR 605PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
BARTELS, District Judge.
Defendant Marat Balagula moves to dismiss the indictment against him, pursuant to § '3162(a)(2) of Title 18 of the United States Code, on the ground that he has not been tried within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq. The basis for this motion is that the judge to whom this case previously was assigned erred in excluding certain periods from the speedy trial clock, Facts
Balagula was arraigned on October 22, 1985, along with five others, on charges of credit card fraud, at which time the court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Mitchell JanikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Michael Lawrence PollockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Mark A. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. James Tunnessen, Douglas Fullerton, and Michael Robert Reape, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BarnettCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
- United States v. LevasseurDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986