Just In-Material Designs, Ltd. v. I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
opinion of the court
Fein, J.
Defendant (I.T.A.D.) is an importer of greige (unfinished) textile fabrics. Plaintiff (Designs) is a textile converter which purchases unfinished goods and has them finished for resale. In late May or early June, 1981, Associated Textile Brokers Co. (Associated), a textile broker, negotiated a sale of piece goods by defendant to plaintiff. Each of the parties asserts the broker represented the other. On the face of the record it must be concluded that *104the broker represented both. It is undisputed that neither party communicated directly with the other in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Wen Kroy Realty Co. v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Schubtex, Inc. v. Allen Snyder, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re the Arbitration Between Albrecht Chemical Co. & Anderson Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McLaughlin v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Irving R. Boody & Co. v. Win Holdings International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In re the Arbitration between Mostek Corp. & North American Foreign Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kilmer v. Flocar, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Ojeni v. LieberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.