Wilson v. Wagner
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Justice.
This suit was instituted by appellees, Katherine Redmond Wagner and husband, L. L. Wagner, against Sam E. Wilson, Jr., and The Wilson Building, Inc., seeking, among other things, to have a certain option for a 99 year lease upon Lots 11 and 12 in Block 4 of the Bluff Portion of the City of Corpus Christi, declared to be invalid and unenforceable, because its provisions are allegedly uncertain and indefinite, in that they fail to specify with particularity the terms and conditions of such 99 year lease.
The instrument involved reads as follows :
“Option Agreemdht.
“State of Texas,
“…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shayeb v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Levin v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Taber v. Pettus Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942
- Taber v. Pettus Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Miller v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cleveland Regional Medical Center, L.P. v. Celtic Properties, L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
- Robert Marx and Debbie Marx v. Fdp, Lp, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Castroville Airport, Inc. v. City of Castroville, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Ridglea Interests, Inc. v. General Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Vallejo v. Pioneer Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.