Legal Opinion
Grimes v. New Century Mortgage Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 22, 2003No. 02-15430PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Dissent by Judge MCKEOWN.
OPINION
NOONAN, Circuit Judge.
Richard L. Grimes and Rosa L. Grimes (the Grimeses) appeal the judgment of the district court in favor of New Century Mortgage Corporation (New Century). The Grimeses brought suit against New Century for violation of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. (TiLA) and Federal Reserve Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.23(a)(3) (Reg.Z) and for unfair business practices in violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment on the TiLA claim and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Edna Jackson v. Syd Grant, Belle G. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Converse v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ramsey v. Vista Mortgage Corp. (In Re Ramsey)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hauk v. JP Morgan Chase Bank USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AlsagerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Grimes v. New Century Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hauk v. Jp Morgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN v. AlsagerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011