Legal Opinion

Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Alsager

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 24, 2011No. 66019-5-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 The terms of a binding agreement between parties are evidenced by their objective manifestation of mutual intent.1 Here, the promissory note and deed of trust that Dale and Betty Alsager signed evidence the terms and conditions of their loan transaction with the bank. We reject their claim that their loan application for a specific fixed-rate loan evidences a lack of a meeting of the minds for the loan terms. Moreover, they had no right to rely on oral representations by a notary public regarding the nature of the loan that conflicted with the written terms of the loan documents. The bank…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. GLEPCO, LLC v. ReinstraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Hoover v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Aaron & Jaime Reinstra v. Glepco, Llc And Greg & Pamela HintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Bell v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  5. G. Steven Hammond, M.d. v. The Everett Clinic, PllcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API