Legal Opinion
Guhl Midtown Eye Care Optical v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 1983No. 45934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Employer, Guhl Midtown Eye Care Optical, appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court affirming an order of the Missouri Commission on Human Rights awarding complainant Martha Mitchell $3,746.50 as back pay. The award was based on a finding that the employer sexually discriminated against Ms. Mitchell by paying her a lesser wage than a male employee, Arvind Amin, for substantially similar work contrary to Sec. 296.020 RSMo 1978. We affirm. In this opinion we have borrowed liberally from the memorandum opinion of the trial court, Judge George A. Adolph.
Our review is limited to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, a Corporation E. M. Lynn, D/B/A Lynn Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Jacquelyn Katz v. School District of Clayton, Missouri, a Public School CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Kansas City v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- St. Louis County v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laclede Cab Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Feltz v. HesselbackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Laclede Cab Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988