Rafeiro v. American Employers' Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Plaintiff property owner has appealed from a summary judgment in favor of her contractor’s insurer in an action entitled “Complaint for Indemnity” in which she sought to recover from the insurer the amount of a judgment together with costs and interest she had previously secured against the insured contractor. (See Ins. Code, § 11580.) The facts, with one exception hereinafter noted, are not disputed. Each party made a motion for a summary judgment. The resolution of the controversy turns upon the proper interpretation of the terms of the policy of comprehensive liability…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. ReederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. City of TurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- McNeilab, Inc. v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.