Legal Opinion

Otts v. Brough

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1965No. 9674PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Appellants, husband and wife, have appealed' from a summary judgment dismissing their tort action directed against respondent, for recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by appellant Charles Otts.

On or about June 1, 1963, respondent, hereinafter sometimes referred to as Brough, as general contractor, obtained a contract for the construction of two school buildings — the Eastside and Westside — for School District No. 321, Rexburg, Idaho.

Appellant Charles Otts, sometimes hereinafter referred to as Otts, obtained a copy of the plans and specifications of the school…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Mann v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Leliefeld v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Harrison v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API