Legal Opinion

Hill v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, C. J.

The basis of' the present action is the alleged unconstitutionality of chapter 46, Public-Local Laws, Extra Session, 1924.

It is contended, in the first place, that the act in question is violative of Article II, sec. 29, of the Constitution, which provides, in part, as follows: “The General Assembly shall not pass any local, private, or special act or resolution . . . authorizing the laying out, opening, altering, maintaining, or discontinuing of highways, streets, or alleys.”

In Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 598, it was said that the prohibition of this section of the Constitution was against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Road CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. State v. . KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Township Road Commission v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Day v. Commissioners of Yadkin CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Deese v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. In Re the Resolutions Passed by the City Council of the City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API