Peak Development, LLP v. Juntunen
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Jeremy Juntunen (Juntunen) appeals from the order entered in the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, denying his motion to set aside the entry of a judgment of default against him and ordering him to pay $64,121.85 in damages. We affirm.
¶2 We restate the issue on appeal as follows:
¶3 Did the denial of Juntunen’s motion to set aside the entry of the default judgment constitute an abuse of discretion?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶4 On July 2, 2003, Peak Development, LLP (Peak) filed a civil suit *411in the Eleventh Judicial District Court alleging that Juntunen breached a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Blume v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Bahm v. SouthworthMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Cribb v. Matlock Communications, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- Karlen v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
- Matthews v. Don K ChevroletMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re the Marriage of OrcuttMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Skogen v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Antonick v. Estate of LutgenMontana Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.