Legal Opinion

Skogen v. Murray

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2007No. DA 06-0478PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Bob Murray, Jr., filed a motion for relief from an order and a judgment pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 60(b) in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, which was deemed denied because the District Court did not rule on the motion within sixty days of filing, pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 60(c). We reverse and remand.

¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion in denying Murray’s M. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.

BACKGROUND

¶3 This appeal arises out of three consolidated cases contesting property boundaries: Harding v. Savoy, Cause No. CDV-00-804; Skogen v. Savoy,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. L. P. Steuart, Inc. v. Joseph H. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bahm v. SouthworthMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Karlen v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Griffin v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re the Marriage of OrcuttMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bartell v. ZabawaMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Bartell v. ZabawaMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API