Legal Opinion

Bahm v. Southworth

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2000No. 99-495PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Montana’s Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, denied Tina and Dale Southworth’s (the Southworths) motion to set aside a default judgment which was entered pursuant to Rule 37(d), M.R.Civ.P., for the Southworths’ failure to comply with discovery requests. The Southworths now appeal. We affirm.

¶2 The Southworths state the issue as:

¶3 Did the District Court err when it denied the Southworths’ Rule 60(b)(6), M.R.Civ.P, motion to set aside default judgment?

Standard of Review

¶4 As a general rule, cases should be tried on the merits and judgments by default are not favored.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Karlen v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Groves v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Anderson v. StokesMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Matthews v. Don K ChevroletMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Xu v. McLaughlin Research Institute for Biomedical Science, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Green v. Gerber Stockton OilMontana Supreme Court · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API