Legal Opinion

Kaushal v. State Bank of India

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 1, 1983No. 82 C 7414PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Satya Kaushal (“Kaushal”), Vinod Kaushal and Raja Enterprises, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively “Raja Companies”) have sued the State Bank of India (“SBI”), several of its officers and employees and several other individual and corporate defendants for treble damages and injunctive relief under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) (“Private RICO” or, consistently with the manner in which all other sections of Title 18 are cited in this opinion, “Section 1964(e)”). 1 Plaintiffs have also asserted pendent state law claims for damages and injunctive…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Cianci v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. In Re Fredeman Litigation. Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. Channel Fueling Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Alfaro v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API