Legal Opinion
Blakeman v. Planning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 5, 1965PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShannon, J.
The plaintiff submitted a plan to the defendant for the resubdivision of a parcel of land in Shelton known as lot 36, Trap Falls Estates, section 2. He desired to cut a road through a portion of lot 36 to reach thirty-four acres of land, immediately adjacent and owned by him, for the purpose of subdividing that acreage.
The defendant was created by ordinance under § 8-19 of the General Statutes. Pursuant to § 8-25 of the General Statutes, the defendant adopted regulations concerning “subdivision” and “resubdivision”, which are synonymous (in the regula tions). Particular regulations provide…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Beach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Senior v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Crescent Development Corporation v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Young v. Town Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Town of Westport v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Reed v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- J & M Realty Co. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Ghent v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.