Legal Opinion
J & M Realty Co. v. City of Norwalk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 27, 1968PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
The plaintiff is the owner of a parcel of land, 5.74 acres in area, located in the city of Nor-walk, adjacent to the Connecticut Turnpike. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company owns a tract of land abutting that of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff has entered into a contract with the railroad to purchase a three-acre parcel of this land. Because of the nature of the proposed purchase, it constituted a subdivision for which approval was required by the Norwalk planning commission in the first instance and then by the Nor-walk common council. The plaintiff’s application for a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Bergner v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- St. John's Roman Catholic Church Corp. v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bossert Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- RK Development Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Helbig v. Zoning Commission of Noank Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Town of Westport v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.