Legal Opinion

United States v. Randock

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2009No. Nos. 08-30268, 08-30308PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Steven and Dixie Randock appeal their sentences imposed following their guilty pleas to conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, in -violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1341, and 1343. The Randocks entered into Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreements with materially identical terms that set out specific sentences of thirty-six months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release. The agreements acknowledged, however, that the parties disagreed on the calculation of the sentencing guidelines range and would dispute whether the sentences should…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. HammonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Saint-JeanDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API