United States v. Saint-Jean
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN E. CONRAD, District Judge.
Andre Feme SainNJean, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed this action as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The government has filed a motion to dismiss to which Saint-Jean has responded, making the matter ripe for the court’s disposi tion. For the reasons that follow, the government’s motion to dismiss will be granted and Saint-Jean’s motion to vacate will be denied. Additionally, the court will deny Saint-Jean's motion for discovery and his motion for an evidentiary hearing.
Background
On September…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stokes v. USA - 2255District Court, D. Maryland · 2021