Legal Opinion

United States v. Saint-Jean

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided February 17, 2010No. Criminal Action No. 5:06CR00038-007. Civil Action No. 5:09CV80181PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLEN E. CONRAD, District Judge.

Andre Feme SainNJean, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed this action as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The government has filed a motion to dismiss to which Saint-Jean has responded, making the matter ripe for the court’s disposi tion. For the reasons that follow, the government’s motion to dismiss will be granted and Saint-Jean’s motion to vacate will be denied. Additionally, the court will deny Saint-Jean's motion for discovery and his motion for an evidentiary hearing.

Background

On September…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stokes v. USA - 2255District Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API