Legal Opinion

Walker v. Brigham City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1993No. 910240PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Leo A. Walker appeals the orders of the First Judicial District Court denying his motion for summary judgment and granting defendant Brigham City’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Brigham City, a municipal corporation, owns and operates the only electric utility in the city. The governing body of Brigham City, the Brigham City Council (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Brigham City”), sets the rates for service.

Walker, a citizen of Brigham City, receives and pays for electric utility service from the city-owned utility. The fees that Walker and all…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mississippi Power Co. v. GoudyMississippi Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. V-1 Oil Co. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Stop Exploiting Taxpayers v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Tooele Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Tooele City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. HCICUtah Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API