CATES v. INTEGRIS HEALTH, INC.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Wyrick, J.:
*100 ¶ 1 Elizabeth Cates claims that Integris wrongfully billed her for services she received after being admitted to one of Integris's facilities following a car accident. She also claims that Integris has performed the same wrongful billing practice on other patients. The question in this appeal is whether these patients may pursue state-law remedies for their alleged harms.
¶ 2 Cates brought state-law claims for breach of contract, deceit, and violation of the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, 15 O.S. §§ 751 et seq . But Integris argues that Cates's claims are expressly preempted by…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- FOX v. MIZESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- SOUTHWEST ORTHOPAEDIC SPECIALISTS v. ALLISONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- Elliott v. Tulsa Cement, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- Anderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.