National Insulation Transportation Committee v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge:
The National Insulation Transportation Committee, petitioner, appeals from the Interstate Commerce Commission’s decision declining to order refunds of excess charges paid under a practice that it determined to be unreasonable. The Commission can-celled Consolidated Rail Corporation’s minimum weight requirements for shipments of insulating materials as unreasonable; the Commission decided, however, that it was not required to award refunds to the shippers and refused to order such refunds. We believe that the Commission acted within its discretion in declining…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Wong Kim Bo, A/K/A Yee Kuk Ho, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Burns v. AlcalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kevin Michael McCarthy Thomas William BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. MottoloDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985
- United States v. John Peter McGoffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.