Legal Opinion
United States v. Putzi
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 4, 1988No. Civ. C-1-86-0290PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM. AND ORDER
HERMAN J. WEBER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 6) and the documents filed in opposition and reply thereto. The Court has reviewed the arguments made by the parties and has applied the principles of controlling law to the facts presented. The legal standard for consideration and disposition of issues on summary judgment is well-settled.
Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answer to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. ErkardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- United States v. RushingDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002