Legal Opinion
United States v. Erkard
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 25, 1996No. 5:95 CV 479PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
Currently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, (docket # 9), filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff, the United States, seeks payment from defendant James T. Erkard as a result of his default on two promissory notes executed in connection with his receipt of two Health Education Assistance Loans (HEAL) in the early eighties. Defendant denies owing on the loans, claiming that the debt was discharged in bankruptcy. The United States contends that, despite the discharge to which defendant refers, he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Matter of Frederick G. Johnson and Vallera J. Johnson, A/k/a, Vallera K. Joyner, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- In Re DoersamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- Davenport v. Fernandez (In Re Davenport)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1982
- United States v. PutziDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alfes v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (In Re Alfes)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Garmhausen v. Sallie Mae Servicing Corp. (In Re Garmhausen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. RushingDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Educational Credit Management Corp. v. PulleyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Matthews v. Educational Credit Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.