Legal Opinion

State v. Haney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 2013No. 111034432; A150603Published

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of two counts of unauthorized use of a vehicle (UUV), ORS 164.135(1)(a). Those convictions arose from a single incident in which defendant was driving a car in Oregon without the permission of the owner or of a tow yard that had a lien interest in the car. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to merge the two convictions under ORS 161.067(2) because the owner of the car and the tow yard owned joint interests in the car. We agree and, therefore, reverse and remand.

We recite the relevant facts, which are undisputed, from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. Lucio-CamargoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. BowersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. SalvadorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API