Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 18, 1990No. 2:89-cv-73294PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, District Judge.
On November 9, 1989, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), the plaintiff in this matter, filed a complaint against Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), the defendant in this matter. Conrail’s complaint seeks contractual indemnity from Ford for the settlement monies paid out by Conrail for claims made against it by Sidney P. Young, a Conrail employee. This matter is presently before the Court on Ford’s July 16, 1990, Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I. Summary Judgment
To warrant the grant of summary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- FabArc Steel Supply, Inc. v. COMPOSITE CONSTR. SYSTEMS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. Auto Warehousing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- MT BUILDERS, LLC v. Fisher Roofing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- McNally & Nimergood v. Neumann-Kiewit Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Dawn Rannals v. Diamond Jo CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.