Legal Opinion

FabArc Steel Supply, Inc. v. COMPOSITE CONSTR. SYSTEMS, INC.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 2005No. 1031890PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

FabArc Steel Supply, Inc. ("FabArc"), appeals a summary judgment entered by the Morgan Circuit Court for Composite Construction Systems, Inc. ("CCSI"), and the denial of FabArc's cross-motion for summary judgment against CCSI, all with respect to FabArc's third-party action against CCSI in litigation arising out of a death at a construction site. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Shimizu America Corporation ("Shimizu") was the general contractor for…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Homes of Legend, Inc. v. McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. McLemore v. FlemingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. City of Birmingham v. Business Realty Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Brown Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Latham v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Holcim (US), Inc. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Murray v. Holiday Isle, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
  4. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Holcim (US), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Black Diamond Development, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API