United States v. Weed
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Chief Judgé.
Richard Weed, a securities lawyer, wrote false opinion letters so that his two co-conspirators could sell stock to the public in a “pump and dump” scheme. 1 In connection tyith this conduct, he was convicted of securities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit both. Following the jury’s guilty verdict, Weed moved for a judgment of acquittal. He argued that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, relying on a novel interpretation of a particular Securities Act provision.- The district court denied Weed’s motion. After careful consideration, we affirm.
I
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. NaftalinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. WeedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- SEC v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
- SEC v. VeldhuisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2026
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. SargentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. WeedDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018