Legal Opinion

United States v. Weed

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 6, 2017No. 16-2120PPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Chief Judgé.

Richard Weed, a securities lawyer, wrote false opinion letters so that his two co-conspirators could sell stock to the public in a “pump and dump” scheme. 1 In connection tyith this conduct, he was convicted of securities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit both. Following the jury’s guilty verdict, Weed moved for a judgment of acquittal. He argued that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, relying on a novel interpretation of a particular Securities Act provision.- The district court denied Weed’s motion. After careful consideration, we affirm.

I

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. NaftalinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. WeedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. SEC v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
  3. SEC v. VeldhuisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2026
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. SargentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. WeedDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API