Legal Opinion
Coady v. Martin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 25, 2001No. AC 20738PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
This case primarily concerns the enforceability of a written agreement between two entrepreneurs who decided to use the concept of “Ebbets Field” as a trademark and logo1 that might serve as a marketing device for a variety of projects, principally in the greater Hartford region. Whether such an agreement is enforceable depends upon whether its terms demonstrated an agreement, in law and in fact, on all essential issues in dispute. The trial court held that the agreement did not do so. We agree.
The plaintiffs, James Coady and Joanne Coady, filed a revised complaint charging…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perricone v. PerriconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Sullivan v. ThorndikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Johnson Electric Co. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Duplissie v. DevinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- 111 Whitney Avenue, Inc. v. Commissioner of Mental RetardationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.