Taber v. Tole Landscape Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Price, J.:
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The question involved is whether, under the facts and circumstances shown, injury resulting from a heatstroke is compensable. The commissioner and trial court held that it is, and the employer and its insurance carrier have appealed.
Claimant had lived in Independence all of his life. In the summer of 1953 he joined the army and served in various localities until May, 1955, at which time he received his discharge in Texas. He sought employment in Houston, and about the middle of July of that year returned…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Carney v. HellarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Hoag v. Kansas Independent Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Murphy v. I. C. U. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Madison v. Key Work Clothes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Siebert v. HochSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Makalous v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Bryant v. MIDWEST STAFF SOLUTIONS, INC.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Martin v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.