In the Matter of Danielle Ross and Christopher Ross
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The respondent, Christopher Ross, appeals an order of the Circuit Court (Cooper, M., approved by Ryan, J.) dismissing his petition for a fault-based divorce and the final order of the court (Cooper, M., approved by Stephen, J.) in his divorce from the petitioner, Danielle Ross. He argues that the trial court erred: (1) in granting the petitioner’s motion to dismiss based upon the defense of recrimination; (2) in failing to award him more than half of the marital estate; and (8) in failing to retroactively modify temporary support orders based upon the petitioner’s allegedly understated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Petition of KiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Brewies v. BrewiesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
- In re BlanchflowerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Hill v. DobrowolskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of Keli Eckroate-Breagy and Paul BreagySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- In the Matter of Lura Sanborn and Jeffrey BartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
- John C. Rankin & a. v. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. v. TruexCullins and Partners Architects & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- John C. Rankin & a. v. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. v. TruexCullins and Partners Architects & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019