Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Danielle Ross and Christopher Ross

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 23, 2016No. 2015-0345PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

The respondent, Christopher Ross, appeals an order of the Circuit Court (Cooper, M., approved by Ryan, J.) dismissing his petition for a fault-based divorce and the final order of the court (Cooper, M., approved by Stephen, J.) in his divorce from the petitioner, Danielle Ross. He argues that the trial court erred: (1) in granting the petitioner’s motion to dismiss based upon the defense of recrimination; (2) in failing to award him more than half of the marital estate; and (8) in failing to retroactively modify temporary support orders based upon the petitioner’s allegedly understated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Petition of KiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Brewies v. BrewiesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  4. In re BlanchflowerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. Hill v. DobrowolskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Keli Eckroate-Breagy and Paul BreagySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  2. In the Matter of Lura Sanborn and Jeffrey BartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
  3. John C. Rankin & a. v. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. v. TruexCullins and Partners Architects & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  4. John C. Rankin & a. v. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. South Street Downtown Holdings, Inc. v. TruexCullins and Partners Architects & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API