Legal Opinion
Petition of Kilton
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 31, 2007No. 2007-245PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The petitioner, Grant Kilton, has petitioned for a writ of certiorari, see Sup. Ct. R. 11, challenging the denial by the respondent, the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (department), of his application for benefits under the Aid to the Permanently and Totally Disabled (APTD) program. See RSA 167:6, VI (2002). We affirm.
I
The record supports the following facts. In April 2005, the petitioner applied for benefits under the APTD program, which is one of various public assistance programs administered by the department. See Baker v. City of Concord, 916 F.2d 744, 745 (1st…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Robert Jesurum v. WBTSCC Limited Partnership & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Margaret Dolbeare v. City of LaconiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- CaremarkPCS Health, LLC v. New Hampshire Department of Administrative ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Kenneth H. Hart v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- University System of New Hampshire Board of Trustees & A. v. Marco Dorfsman & ASupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.