Legal Opinion

Hill v. Dobrowolski

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 5, 1984No. 83-368PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant for trespass and for violation of RSA 540-A:3, II, III, and IV (Supp. 1983), restricting a landlord’s rights against a tenant of residential property in the absence of consent or judicial authorization. The Superior Court (Cann, J.) granted defendant’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiff appeals the dismissal of the count for statutory violations. We reverse.

In addressing the motion to dismiss, the parties and the trial court considered facts outside the pleadings. The record before us indicates that the following facts may be taken as true…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooperman v. MacNeilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. Wisniewski v. GemmillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. Bilodeau v. AntalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Weeks v. SlySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
  5. Russell v. FabyanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HermsdorfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Case v. St. Mary's BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  3. Kantner v. Combustion EngineeringDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1988
  4. In Re ChoySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. Evans v. J Four Realty, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API