Legal Opinion

Burton v. United States

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 17, 1956No. C-136-55PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have sued to recover, with interest, $1,977.97, claimed to have been erroneously assessed and collected against them by the Collector of Internal Revenue as a deficiency in income taxes for 1948-1949. This amount related to payments that Francis A. Burton had made to his former wife under the terms of a modified divorce decree, and for which he had claimed deduction.

At the pre-trial conference it appeared that the determinative facts were not in dispute. Accordingly, ail opportunity was afforded for the filing of a motion for summary judgment, which was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Avrick v. Rockmont Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. Schreffler v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. Zampos v. United States Smelting, Refining and Mining Co. Anderson v. United States Smelting, Refining and Mining CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  5. Smith's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ware v. St. Louis Car CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Suarez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  3. Alan E. Ashcraft, Jr. And Jean J. Ashcraft v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  4. Odom v. TrippDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983
  5. Aleut Corp. v. Arctic Slope Regional Corp.District Court, D. Alaska · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API