Lockert v. Lockert

MARTIN, Judge.

By five assignments of error, defendant contends (1) that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over this equitable distribution case because the commission which assigned Judge Neely to this case is defective, (2) that the order dismissing defendant’s appeal is void since it was entered out of term, out of session, and out of county, and (3) that the trial court improperly dismissed defendant’s original appeal from the equitable distribution judgment.

Initially, defendant argues that the equitable distribution judgment dated 1 December 1992 and the order dismissing defendant’s…