Legal Opinion

Hein v. PRECISION ASSOCIATES, INC.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 2000No. C7-99-1708Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORIS OHLSEN HUSPENI, * Judge

Relator seeks review of the commissioner’s representative’s decision that she was disqualified from receiving reemployment benefits because she quit her job without a good reason caused by her employer. We affirm.

FACTS

Relator Lisa Hein worked full-time as a rubber cutter for respondent Precision Associates. During 1998, attendance became a problem for her. Hein contends some of her absences were due to medical problems. On September 23, 1998, to address Hein’s absenteeism, Precision reduced her scheduled work hours.

Hein’s attendance problems persisted.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Ferguson v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Jones v. Rosemount, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Kehoe v. Minnesota Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API